The Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy
The Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy is the story of the
twentieth century struggle to preserve the historic Christian faith. The
extremist takes the Bible to be the expression of God. He is addressed as a
'Fundamentalist for the reason that he accepts the base philosophy of the
Christian faith. A Modernist takes himself to be a Christian, though he accepts
the new divinity, a social faith, and discards the large doctrines of the
gospel as being trivial theories.
The struggle has focused about the supernaturalism that is in
Christianity. The Fundamentalist emphasize that there is only one true faith.
The Modernist says that there are many beliefs. The Fundamentalists upheld that
the Church of Jesus Christ necessarily be chaste and present only the true
gospel. The Modernist wishes the church to be comprehensive, with all
comportments of opinions and values represented in it.
The Fundamentalist had the great respect for the great creedal confessions of the church. The modernist entrusted creeds to the historical credentials and trustworthy issues. Fundamentalism was direct, zealous whereas Modernism was illusory, indistinct, and vague. The Modernist spoke about being without principle and without trust.
The Fundamentalist went on sincerely for the devotion, his Scriptural obligation. The Modernist mocked the thought. The Modernist assaulted upon those principles, a document that called such doctrines "theories," insisting that they were not the only theories allowable by the Bible, and that the doctrine of the infancy of the Scriptures was detrimental to the existence of the church. This situation then had become prevailing in numerous churches and religious institutions, and was a condition that made possible the comprehensive global movement.
The modernist association was represented in the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. and the World Council of Churches, with their force to construct the "impending immense church" and one-global government.
The Fundamentalist interest group was represented in the American Council of Christian Churches and the International Council of Christian' Churches, and their ' demanded for an indisputable Twentieth Century Restoration.
The Fundamentalist had the great respect for the great creedal confessions of the church. The modernist entrusted creeds to the historical credentials and trustworthy issues. Fundamentalism was direct, zealous whereas Modernism was illusory, indistinct, and vague. The Modernist spoke about being without principle and without trust.
The Fundamentalist went on sincerely for the devotion, his Scriptural obligation. The Modernist mocked the thought. The Modernist assaulted upon those principles, a document that called such doctrines "theories," insisting that they were not the only theories allowable by the Bible, and that the doctrine of the infancy of the Scriptures was detrimental to the existence of the church. This situation then had become prevailing in numerous churches and religious institutions, and was a condition that made possible the comprehensive global movement.
The modernist association was represented in the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. and the World Council of Churches, with their force to construct the "impending immense church" and one-global government.
The Fundamentalist interest group was represented in the American Council of Christian Churches and the International Council of Christian' Churches, and their ' demanded for an indisputable Twentieth Century Restoration.
Comments
Post a Comment